This
project will give you the chance to research how language is used in real-life
situations, in a way that reading books and studying grammar cannot. You will
get the chance to think critically about the ways in which language can be a
tool that either empowers or disempowers. You will express your thoughts
clearly, using the grammar, vocabulary and organization that we have worked on
this year.
In this
paper, you will present your observations in five-paragraph essay format.
Please choose one of the following thesis statements.
1.
Overall, the ways that language is used at my
school serve to empower me.
2.
Overall, the ways that language is used at my
school serve to disempower me.
3.
In some contexts, the ways that language is used
at my school empower me, while in other contexts, they disempower me.
In your three supporting
paragraphs, provide at least three examples from your research that support
your thesis statement. For example, if you argue that language use at SCH is
empowering and disempowering at the same time, you might write two supporting
paragraphs about empowering situations and one paragraph about a disempowering
situation. Perhaps in one paragraph, you might choose to discuss how you sometimes
feel able to express yourself in ways that monolingual people, (people who can
only speak one language,) cannot, by switching back and forth between languages
in order to use words that are unique to each language. Conversely, in another
paragraph, you might choose to explore times when you feel you are not able to
express yourself because using Chinese might cause others to react negatively
in a certain situation. Be sure to use direct quotes from your classmates to
support your statements. Finally, be sure to wrap up your thoughts with a
conclusion paragraph.
Deadlines:
- Nov. 25: show research notes
- Dec. 9: 1st draft due-- turn in to Ms. Baker and give one copy to a classmate for peer editing
- Dec. 11: complete peer editing
- Dec. 16: final draft due
**Late policy: For each day an assignment is late, five percentage points will be deducted from your final score.
Grammar
|
Vocabulary
|
Organization
|
Complexity
|
Required Elements
|
3: Few (5 or fewer) minor grammatical errors that
do not interfere with comprehension
|
3:
Includes 3 or more new vocabulary words from vocab workbook. Uses almost all
words correctly, with 1-0 words used incorrectly. Words are precise and
clearly convey meaning.
|
3:
Includes intro paragraph with thesis sentence, three supporting paragraphs,
and a conclusion. Examples strongly support thesis. Tight cohesion: uses
transitional words and phrases and other cohesive devices.
|
3:
Varied sentence structures and lengths. Includes simple sentences, compound
sentences, (which use FANBOYS,) and complex sentences, (which contain
dependent clauses.) Contains 1-0 run-ons or fragments.
|
3:
Contains 6 direct quotes from classmates, using proper punctuation.
Incorporates examples from at least 3 of the assigned research topics in
supporting paragraphs.
|
2: Some (10 or fewer) grammatical errors that
somewhat interfere with comprehension
|
2: Includes 2 new vocab
words from vocab workbook. Uses most words correctly, with 2 or fewer used
incorrectly. Words are mostly precise, with some vagueness that may impede
expression.
|
2: Follows five-paragraph
structure but does not fully develop all paragraphs. Examples support thesis.
Shows some cohesion but may contain 1 or 2 jarring transitions.
|
2: Somewhat varied sentence
structure and lengths. May rely heavily on simple and compound sentences. Contains 2 or fewer run-ons or fragments.
|
2: Contains 5 direct quotes
from classmates, with 1 or 2 minor errors in punctuation. Incorporates
examples from at least 3 of the assigned research topics, but some examples
may be under-developed.
|
1: Many (11 or more grammatical errors that
interfere significantly with comprehension
|
1:
Includes 1-0 vocab words from vocab workbook. Uses 3 or more words
incorrectly. Words are often imprecise, and this vagueness impedes
expression.
|
1:
Shows some elements of five-paragraph structure but some paragraphs may be
omitted or under-developed. Examples weakly support thesis. Lacks cohesion;
many jarring transitions that interfere with comprehension.
|
1:
Little variation in sentence structure and lengths; relies heavily on simple and compound
sentence. May contain few (2 or fewer) complex
sentences. Contains 3 or more run-ons or fragments.
|
1:
Contains 4 or fewer direct quotes from classmates, with several errors in
punctuation. Incorporates examples from 2 or fewer of the assigned research
topics. May have underdeveloped examples.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment